Category Archives: Truth

The Manti Te’o Dead Girlfriend Hoax and The Crisis in American Journalism

manti-teo-siI’m a college football fan. I like the Notre Dame Fighting Irish. I revere The Four Horsemen, Knute Rockne, and winning one for the Gipper. But the Manti Te’o story is making me nuts. It’s more than just a juicy scandal that’s currently fueling countless hours of sports talk radio – it’s a clear and alarming signal that journalism in America is in a state of crisis.

http://deadspin.com/5976517/manti-teos-dead-girlfriend-the-most-heartbreaking-and-inspirational-story-of-the-college-football-season-is-a-hoax

You can follow the link above to read all about the biggest sports story of the moment: The Manti Te’o Girlfriend Hoax.

40covv7wood_promoA blogger at Deadspin.com broke the story – and burst young Manti’s golden bubble — but how in the world did the mainstream media, especially Sports Illustrated magazine, fail to apply the barest minimum of journalistic standards to one of the biggest college sports stories of the year?

I’m a television producer – and I’ve told a lot of stories about celebrities in series like Behind The Music and Fame For Fifteen, among others. (And mind you, these are not “news” shows – they’re entertainment.) Yet it’s my responsibility as a producer and storyteller not to take anything for granted, not to accept anything at face value – and to follow up on all aspects of the story that provoke questions.

So much of what Sports Illustrated reported in Pete Thamel’s October 1, 2012 cover story, The Full Manti, begged for what I would have considered very basic follow-up reporting. Had that basic research been done, due diligence calls been made, and had quotes been sought from any of the girlfriend’s family — this hoax would have begun to unravel before SI’s story ever hit the newsstand.

What were the editors at Sports Illustrated thinking?

This is NOT the mythical Lennay Kekua.

NOT the mythical Lennay.

In his article, Pete Thanel wrote:

“Te’o had dated Lennay Kekua, 22, for nearly a year. She’d been hospitalized in California since an April 28 car accident left her on the brink of death. Two months after the accident, as she began to recover from her injuries, doctors discovered that she had leukemia and sent her to a new hospital…”

Did Pete Thamel follow up to learn where “Lennay Kekua” had been hospitalized? Did he seek any photos from her car accident? (These are usually available because of insurance investigations.) Did he try to talk to any of her doctors? Had Thamel done any of this basic reporting, the story might have started to unravel before it ever got published. Or, better yet, Thamel could have broken the hoax himself.

But it gets much worse. Te’o told Thamel that…

“As Lennay struggled to survive, Te’o developed a nightly ritual in which he would go to sleep while on the phone with her. When he woke up in the morning his phone would show an eight-hour call, and he would hear Lennay breathing on the other end of the line. Her relatives told him that at her lowest points, as she fought to emerge from a coma, her breathing rate would increase at the sound of his voice.”

2012 Heisman Trophy PresentationNow, I’m just a reality TV producer – not a national reporter for Sports Illustrated – but a paragraph like the one above cries out for substantiation and follow-up for dramatic reasons alone! Wouldn’t you want to talk to the relatives who told Manti his calls had been so miraculously therapeutic? Get a quote from them about the amazing effect of Manti’s calls? Wouldn’t you try to talk to the tragic girlfriend’s parents? Had Thamel done the minimum that I’d have required of any producer working for me on such a story, the hoax would have been apparent.

I understand that that Sports Illustrated‘s Manti Te’o cover story can no longer be found in its online archives. Evidently, the entire issue has been scrubbed from the archives. No problem, this is the digital age, and I was able to find a PDF of the article rather easily. And that’s another reason that the media’s Epic Manti Te’o Dead Girlfriend Fail is such a spectacular blunder: basic research is so much easier now. Getting the facts about the mythical “Lennay Kekua” would have been easy.

Manti TeoWas she a student at Stanford? No.

Was she a patient at the hospital? No.

Was there any evidence of her death? No. No obit or death notice could be found.

Did she have any parents to talk to? No.

Do we just take Manti Teo’s word for everything? Evidently, yes.

Was Sports Illustrated more interested in printing a hot-selling cover story than practicing actual journalism? Sadly, it appears the answer is yes.

MAD-Magazine-Manti-Te'o's-Flying-CircusNow, the Manti Te’o Dead Girlfriend Hoax is all the rage in the mass media – especially sports talk radio — and objective, dispassionate, challenging journalism is still nowhere to be found. There’s a lot of blather back and forth about whether Manti is a victim of the hoax or whether he was complicit. But the real questions – the ones that could lead to real answers – are not asked.

Notre Dame officials insist Te’o is a victim. The school maintains that someone using a fictitious name “apparently ingratiated herself with Manti and then conspired with others to lead him to believe she had tragically died of leukemia.” But if Manti is the victim of a hoax, then what did the hoaxers hope to gain by their scam? There’s no indication that “Lennay Kekua” ever asked Manti for money or gifts – or anything? What was in it for them to work so hard for three years?

If Manti is the victim of a hoax, then is the woman who pretended to be “Lennay Kekua” such a great actress that she could – over the course of three long years – manage to act as though she was in a car accident, suffering from Leukemia, and going through the rigors of chemotherapy – sometimes for as long as eight hours on the phone at a time? Is this the least bit plausible?

manti-teo-scandalAnd is anyone asking why, for three years, Notre Dame’s big man on campus, the star players and captain of its football team, would prefer the company of a woman he could only communicate with via the phone to the many, many lovely, available coeds on the South Bend campus?

Did Manti ever ask to Skype with “Lennay Kekua”? What young couple today doesn’t Skype or iChat?

Te’o released a statement saying, “over an extended period of time, I developed an emotional relationship with a woman I met online.” But a story in the South Bend Tribune said the two met after Notre Dame’s 2009 game against Stanford, where she was allegedly a student.

130119000016-tx-teo-t1-wideThose apologists who say that Manti was not involved in the hoax cannot explain this 2009 meeting. And Jeremy Schaap, the ESPN reporter who just interviewed Te’o off-camera, got no traction on this inconsistency. According to USA Today, Te’o admitted that he led his father to believe he had physically met Kekua, although he repeatedly denied to ESPN that any meeting had happened. It was Brian Te’o, Manti’s father, who largely supplied the information for an October article in the South Bend (Ind.) Tribune that chronicled the relationship.”

According to the South Bend Tribune: “Their stares got pleasantly tangled, then Manti Te’o extended his hand to the stranger with a warm smile and soulful eyes.”

Manti “led his father to believe he had physically met Kekua”. So, Manti lied to his dad, right? How is that not participating in the hoax?

Manti’s father went his son one – or several times – better by telling the South Bend Tribune in October 2012, “Every once in a while, she would travel to Hawaii, and that happened to be the time Manti was home, so he would meet with her there.”

Or not.

You’ll hear a lot more about this story in the coming weeks and months. Hopefully, some real journalists will get on it and the truth will out.

But something tells me that Manti Te’o is not the victim here. His hoax story is full of more holes than the Irish defense against Alabama.

The American public is the victim.

The victim of shoddy journalism.

4 Comments

Filed under Sports, Truth

Republican National Convention Day One: One Little Lie & Two Big Lies…

“We’re not going to let our campaign be dictated by fact checkers.”

Ashley O’Connor, Romney TV Advertising Strategist

Ohio Governor John Kasich’s Little Lie

In his address to the Republican National Convention tonight, John Kasich stretched the truth like well-chewed taffy by claiming that President Obama’s policies haven’t helped Ohio’s economy rebound in the past two years. But, by ignoring the positive boost that Obama gave Ohio by bailing out the auto industry and providing much-needed transportation funding and dollars for teachers, firefighters, and cops, etc. through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (AKA “The Stimulus”), Kasich was telling a lie of omission. It was a big lie, but a subtle one.

But there was another lie that Kasich told toward the end of his speech – a little lie, an unnecessary lie, an easily debunked lie – that shows how little he regards the truth when he’s looking to score a point or belittle an opponent.

After having made his case for what he’s done to fix Ohio’s economy, and therefore what the GOP can do for the nation, Kasich took on Vice President Joe Biden. “Folks, let me tell you this,” he said, “Joe Biden disputes a lot of those facts, but Joe Biden told me that he was a good golfer. And I’ve played golf with Joe Biden, I can tell you that’s not true, as well as all of the other things that he says.”

But how good a golfer is Joe Biden really? In a recent Golf Digest ranking of 150 prominent Washington golfers, House Speaker John Boehner was ranked 43rd, President Obama was 108th – and Joe Biden was ranked 29th. Kasich, who doesn’t live in Washington, didn’t make the list. But, as a golfer, Kasich is no Joe Biden. And as an honest politician, he’s even worse.

So what about the facts? Republicans just say what they want to say – the facts be damned — even when it comes to little things.

Former GOP Candidate Rick Santorum’s Big Lie

In his speech, Rick Santorum built upon the Romney campaign’s Big Lie about Obama gutting the welfare work rules. In a loud dog whistle to low information white working class voters, Santorum continued to peddle the nonsense that Obama has unilaterally waived work rules to make it easier for (we presume the shiftless minority poor folk) to collect welfare money for nothing.

By waiving the work requirement, Santorum accused Obama of “acting as if he’s above the law.” But the fact is that President Obama HAS NOT done what Santorum and the Romney campaign have charged. What the President DID DO is, at the request of a bipartisan group of state governors, give those state more flexibility in interpreting the work requirements so that they can get people placed in jobs faster and more efficiently: the very opposite of the GOP Big Lie.

But don’t take my word for it. The fact-checking website PolitiFact says Romney’s claims are “pants on fire” bogus and The Washington Post’s fact checker awarded the Romney campaigns welfare attack on Obama  four Pinocchios, its highest rating. And Annenberg Public Policy Center’s FactCheck.org agreed that the claims are false.

FactCheck.org explains:

“A Mitt Romney TV ad claims the Obama administration has adopted ‘a plan to gut welfare reform by dropping work requirements.’ The plan does neither of those things.”

“Work requirements are not simply being ‘dropped.’ States may now change the requirements — revising, adding or eliminating them — as part of a federally approved state-specific plan to increase job placement.”

“And it won’t ‘gut’ the 1996 law to ease the requirement. Benefits still won’t be paid beyond an allotted time, whether the recipient is working or not.”

Even a Republican architect of the law, Ron Haskins, told NPR: “There’s no plausible scenario under which it really constitutes a serious attack on welfare reform.”

But the GOP’s Big Lie beat goes on…

South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley’s Big Lie

The “you didn’t build that” canard is alive and well – and bigger than ever. In her convention speech, Nikki Haley amplified the utterly bogus assertion that President Obama said that American business people didn’t build their own businesses.

Let’s make this perfectly clear. Here’s what President Obama really said:

“There are a lot of wealthy, successful Americans who agree with me — because they want to give something back. They know they didn’t — look, if you’ve been successful, you didn’t get there on your own. You didn’t get there on your own. I’m always struck by people who think, well, it must be because I was just so smart. There are a lot of smart people out there. It must be because I worked harder than everybody else. Let me tell you something — there are a whole bunch of hardworking people out there.”

 (Applause.)

 “If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help. There was a great teacher somewhere in your life. Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive. Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you’ve got a business — you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen. The Internet didn’t get invented on its own. Government research created the Internet so that all the companies could make money off the Internet.”

The Romney campaign pulled one line out of context – “If you’ve got a business — you didn’t build that” – and ignores the context to create a Big Lie. No matter that Obama’s whole speech is on video, no matter that I was able to Google it for this article in a matter of seconds. Say a lie loud enough and long enough – with all that billionaire super pac money to broasdcast that lie – and the truth no longer matters.

But, here again, don’t take my word for it. Here’s the word from the Romney campaign itself:

“Our most effective ad is our welfare ad,” Romney pollster Neil Newhouse said at a forum hosted by ABC News and Yahoo! News. “Fact checkers come to this with their own sets of thoughts and beliefs, and we’re not going to let our campaign be dictated by fact checkers.”

Caveat emptor my fellow Americans.

6 Comments

Filed under Politics, Truth

Freedom, Burgers & Beer!

Happy July 4th to all my friends and those who follow, read, or just happen to stumble upon this blog.

Today, I’m in Evanston, Illinois getting ready to spend a wonderful day with family and great friends. We’ll watch the Central Street Parade, cool ourselves with Leinenkugel’s Summer Shandy, and then enjoy a backyard barbecue.

Aside from the 100-degree heat, it couldn’t be more perfect.

I’m sure it was just this kind of day that George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams and all our founding fathers had in mind when they decided to throw off the shackles of British rule and risk their lives in a revolution.

Seriously, those brave patriots clearly had weightier matters in mind – but if they could join us as we sip from a bottle of Summer Shandy between bites of a burger hot off the grill, it might have been reason enough for their epochal Declaration of Independence.

5 Comments

Filed under History, Truth

Memorial Day at Arlington West

They’ve been doing it for nearly a decade now.

Every Sunday, from sunrise to sunset, a group called Veterans for Peace puts small white wooden crosses into the sand on the beach in Santa Monica, CA. Each cross represents a soldier’s life lost in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

They call it Arlington West.

Years ago, when I first witnessed this solemn display, the crosses numbered in the hundreds. Today, there are crosses and Stars of David and Islamic crescents to represent the 6,447 fallen American servicemen who have given their lives in service to our county.

When the memorial began in 2003, Veterans for Peace would place one cross in the sand for each servicemen killed. As the numbers of lives lost has grown over the years, there are now an inceasing number of red crosses — each representing 10 lost American soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines.

It’s an incongruous sight, this makeshift, ever-growing military memorial in the shadow of Santa Monica Pier and it’s bustling carnival atmosphere, surrounded by surfers, swimmers and other sun worshippers.  But it’s a necessary reminder of supreme sacrifices made on the other side of the world – far, far away from the pleasures of the Pier and the fun in the sun of Santa Monica Bay.

The goal of Veterans For Peace is to offer “visitors a graceful, visually and emotionally powerful, place for reflection.”

And Arlington West does just that.

Take a moment to ponder the following photos.

On this Memorial Day, pause to reflect at Arlington West.

4 Comments

Filed under History, Random Commentary, Truth

A Childhood Memory of Kent State, May 4, 1970.

On May 4th, we should pause to remember the price of freedom, paid in blood by patriots – like the young people who died at Kent State.

On this day 42 years ago at Kent State University, Ohio National Guardsmen fired 67 shots into a group of students protesting the American invasion of Cambodia — killing four students and wounding nine others, one of whom was permanently paralyzed.

The small college town of Kent is about 40 miles southeast of Cleveland, where on Monday, May 4, 1970 I was an elementary school student at St. Rocco’s School.  The shooting on the Kent State campus began at 12:24 pm – and by the time we were getting out of school at 3:00 pm, the news had reached Cleveland.  But the news was by word of mouth when I first heard it. And it was wrong.

The first thing I heard when I walked out of school along with my 6th grade classmates was that “some hippies had shot some National Guardsmen.”

That’s what I heard from one of the parents waiting to pick up their kids.

When we got home and turned on our black and white television sets, Walter Cronkite set us straight.

Later, Crosby, Still, Nash & Young captured the moment, the sorrow, the sacrifice — and the defiance.

“Ohio”

Written by Neil Young

Tin soldiers and Nixon’s coming,
We’re finally on our own.
This summer I hear the drumming,
Four dead in Ohio.
 
Gotta get down to it
Soldiers are gunning us down
Should have been done long ago.
What if you knew her
And found her dead on the ground
How can you run when you know?
 
Tin soldiers and Nixon’s coming,
We’re finally on our own.
This summer I hear the drumming,
Four dead in Ohio.
Four dead in Ohio
Four dead in Ohio.

5 Comments

Filed under History, Truth

See “Madman” Now!

My brilliant friend Rush Pearson is appearing for just one more week in his one-man show “Diary of a Madman” at The Prop Theatre in Chicago. If you live anywhere near the Chicagoland area — don’t miss it. It’s a compelling, entertaining, very funny show performed by a one-of-a-kind talent.

I’ve known Rush Pearson for 35 years. I’ve written, improvised, rocked and acted onstage with him many, many times. But “Diary of a Madman” just might be Rush’s finest theatrical moment. It is not to be missed.

Get your tickets now at: http://www.brownpapertickets.com/event/227520

But don’t take my word for it. Though I rarely devote my blog posts to the words of others — I urge you to read Neil Steinberg’s review of Rush’s show in The Chicago Sun Times…

Neil Steinberg

Gogol’s Madman Challenges Us All

By NEIL STEINBERG

Chicago Sun Times February 28, 2012

Madness is a universal human condition. Wherever there are people, across the world and throughout history, there are also crazy people, though we don’t like to think about it. Hard enough to notice the insane right here, wandering the streets of Chicago, never mind trying to focus our attention on disturbed beggars in India, or to wonder about the deranged in 1725, lurching about London, their stockings around their ankles, their wigs askew.

Which is what makes “Diary of a Madman” such a treasure, because Nikolai Gogol wrote it in 1835, and it not only is a near-clinical rendition of gathering mental illness — the ballooning self-regard, the fading of reality, the bursts of anger then sudden calm. But it is madness in Czarist Russia almost 200 years ago, one preoccupied with rank, servants, quills, boots and coaches.

Saturday night I saw the one-man show of “Diary” performed by Rush Pearson at the Prop Theatre on Elston Avenue, and it is a disturbing delight. Anyone who knows Rush — and I met him 30 years ago when we were at Northwestern — will joke that his playing Gogol’s unhinged bureaucrat is type-casting. He wasn’t just an actor, but an edgy no-limits wildman, one of those permanent students lingering years after graduation, forgetting to become an adult. Longhaired and big-bearded at a time when people weren’t, particularly people at NU, he lived on cadged food and the sofas of friends, who valued his energy and inherent good humor, the twinkle behind the manic behavior.

He was the star of the Practical Theatre Company, acting in hysterically funny comic reviews along with Julia Louis-Dreyfus, Gary Kroeger, Brad Hall and Paul Barrosse. He also worked at Renaissance fairs, as a mud eater, and when producers from “Saturday Night Live” famously swept into Chicago to raid Practical, hiring Louis-Dreyfus and three others, Rush, the funniest of them all, was off in Texas, eating mud.

That became his career. His Sturdy Beggars are a fixture every summer at the Renaissance Faire in Bristol, Wis., a freewheeling three-man vaudeville performed in a pit of mud, a mix of surprisingly witty wordplay and pratfalls in oozing filth.

Needless to say, I leapt to see Rush perform Gogol. Not a common impulse, apparently — there were 15 others in the audience the night I saw him (and two were other Steinbergs, plus comic Aaron Freeman and his daughter Artemis). The week before, Rush performed for three people one night. That’s tragic itself.

The show is a 90-minute exploration of one man’s sad descent from being Poprishchin, a minor Russian clerk, beset by humiliations and in love above his rank, to Ferdinand the Eighth, King of Spain, in his own mind, desperately trying to maintain royal dignity in a lunatic asylum.

Pearson prowls the room, and a key pleasure of the show is watching his face collapse from beaming, glittery-eyed triumph, marveling at the brilliance of his own observations, into an elderly bewilderment and despair, his mouth a scowl, his eyes blank.

Some people don’t want to be challenged by drama — they want theater to be something pleasant happening on a stage 30 yards away. They do not want a sweaty, bearded maniac’s contorted face raving a foot from theirs. This play is not for them. I loved it.

To me, while we are not all mad, we share the madman’s dilemma. “Why am I clerk?” he cries. “On what grounds? For what reason should I be a clerk?” And then a terrible solution presents itself. “Perhaps I’m not a clerk . . .”

There is no profundity in saying the world has gone mad — it was a cliche centuries ago (“Mad world!” Shakespeare writes.) But I couldn’t help recognize in the twisted thinking of Poprishchin — the vanity, the dismissal of others, the imaginary threats, preferring to see a reality where dogs write letters rather than accept life as it is — the contours of our troubled political moment, where too many Americans embrace any conspiracy, cling to any delusion, rather than tolerate a world where they are not king.

The show runs weekends at Prop Theatre, 3502 N. Elston, until March 25. There’s a first-rate Irish place, Chief O’Neill’s Pub, almost directly across the street, and you might want to work that into your plans, too.

Have you ordered your tickets yet! Get them at: http://www.brownpapertickets.com/event/227520

3 Comments

Filed under Art, Comedy, Truth

26 Seconds to Justice…

This video was sent to me by my friend Melissa from Kansas. As I write this, it’s gotten over 583,000 views on YouTube.

Why, amid the viral clutter of cute cat videos and monkeys riding backwards on pigs has this video become such a hit?

Because it delivers — in 26 seconds — something that’s all too rare in this life: a clear example of justice.

2 Comments

Filed under Comedy, Truth

A Heavenly Two Minute Brain Cleanse

Looking to take a brief break from the GOP war against modern civilization and women’s rights? Do you envision a government that has better things to do than to poke its head into your bedroom to see whether or not you’re using — egad! — contraception? Then, here’s a little more than two minutes of glorious, awe-inspiring brain food, courtesy of your Federal tax dollars, well spent!

Thanks to our good friend and fellow NU alum, Jim McCutchen, for making me aware of this stunning video.

7 Comments

Filed under Beauty, Politics, Truth

One Song: Four Artists

A great song has many lives.

Those who write a song give it life – but after that, their song takes on a life of its own: shaped and reimagined through the experience, talents and style of the artists who cover it. And when the song is a great piece of work – a composition that puts a deeply human, emotional message to a beautiful melody – it will have a long life. A great song will be addressed, caressed and blessed by many musicians over the course of decades.

Some great songs seem impossibly visionary and too emotionally mature to have been written by the callow youths who penned them.

Inspired in a dream, 22-year old Paul McCartney gave us “Yesterday” in 1965.

Since then, there have been more than 1,600 recorded covers of that classic gem.

Bob Dylan was only 20 when he wrote “Blowin’ In The Wind” in 1962.

It’s amazing that such poetry, passion and profound wisdom could flow from someone not even old enough to buy a drink in the Greenwich Village folk clubs.

And Jimmy Webb was just 19 years old when he wrote the brilliant romantic musical short story, “By The Time I Get To Phoenix” around 1965.

Listen to that song again – and picture a teenager building that heartbreaking classic, verse by verse.

Right around the time that the prodigies Webb and McCartney were writing songs that would become standards, 16-year old Jackson Browne wrote an introspective ballad called “These Days”.

It would be nearly a decade before Browne put the song on his second album, “For Everyman”, in 1973.

Here’s a much older Browne performing “These Days”. The song seems perfect for an older and wiser man looking back on a long, hard life. But as you listen, try to strip away the years – and picture a 16-year old kid writing such lyrics.

Now, I’m not a big fan of Nico, but she did have the good taste to record “These Days” in 1967. Pay attention to the arrangement of her version. Four decades later, you’ll hear the influence of Nico’s arrangement in Glen Campbell’s 2008 cover.

Gregg Allman recorded his own cover of “These Days” for his debut solo album, Laid Back, released in 1973, like Browne’s “For Everyman”. (Allman and Browne were both 25-years old at the time.)

Here’s 41-year old Allman performing “These Days” in 1989, harmonizing with the great Graham Nash. It’s remarkable what an additional 16 years of life experience brings to the performance of a song originally written by a kid who had only been alive for 16 years.

The first time I can remember hearing “These Days” was when Glen Campbell featured it on his 2008 album, “Meet Glen Campbell”. Glen was 72 years old when he sang it – and listening to an older and wiser Glen connect with the song, I thought Jackson Browne had written it recently. Surely, a man with something like Glen’s years and experience created those lyrics, and the melancholy yet somehow hopeful melody they’re strung upon. Maybe Jackson had even written it for Glen? But no.

It’s just another moving example of how a great tune written by a soulful young songwriter of preternatural talent can be given new life by a great artist.

7 Comments

Filed under Art, Beauty, Music, Truth

Blackout…

7 Comments

Filed under Politics, Truth